The Case for Brian Schweitzer
Here at Western Democrat, we have previously made the case for Bill Richardson for President or Vice President. But consider another prominent Western Democrat for the currently open position of Democratic nominee for the Vice Presidency, namely Brian Schweitzer, Governor of Montana.
The vice presidential nominee has four roles: to help the ticket win in November, to serve as a loyal part of the new administration, to assume the presidency should disaster strike, and, under happy circumstances, to lead the party eight years hence. Governor Schweitzer is an attractive candidate for all four tasks.
Governor Schweitzer would be a great candidate. He is the popular Democratic governor of a red to purple state who knows how to appeal to Republicans and Independents. He would reinforce the Obama message of turning the page on the red/blue divide of the last decade. He has a natural, folksy charm that would play well on the national stage. He is from way outside Washington in a year when voters are hungry for change in Washington. He does not play into the GOP stereotype of an out of touch Eastern liberal, yet he effectively champions Democratic issues such as education and healthcare. He does not have a trail of potentially controversial votes on wedge issues in the Senate. He is old enough to be successful and experienced both in the private and public sectors, including international experience, while young enough to be a vigorous campaigner. He understands national issues that are particularly important to the West such as energy and water, the West being rich in energy, but chronically short of water. He could help swing crucial states in the West. Montana has only three electoral votes, but he would automatically put his state in play. Neighboring North Dakota is potentially swingable and has three electoral votes. In the rest of the West, Nevada, Colorado, and New Mexico, with a combined nineteen electoral votes, will be critical battlegrounds, and having a Westerner on the ticket would help. The sum total is the equivalent of swinging one big state, which is about the best that a vice presidential nominee can hope to do. Moreover, Governor Schweitzer would be a reassuring choice for a number of wavering constituencies all across the country that the party needs in November.
Governor Schweitzer could serve in an Obama administration without carrying any baggage from the long contest for the nomination. He would bring executive experience to the new administration. He could represent Western and rural constituencies inside a White House with an urban and Midwestern President. And though his easy and down-to-earth demeanor tends to hide it, his successes in life and politics are the natural product of a first-rate mind. Of course, only Senator Obama can tell us if their two personalities are a good working fit.
Given all these assets, I would feel very comfortable with a President Schweitzer should he ascend to the nation’s highest office, ideally eight and a half years hence, after having served President Obama loyally and well.
Leo Brown | June 5, 2008 | Comment on This Post (5 so far) |
Your Name: Your Personal Note: | Your Email: Friends' Emails*: |
Comments
Yes, yes, YES!!!! I've been talking up Schweitzer for VP all over the blogosphere for months, so I'm thrilled to see his name exploding onto the scene (thanks, in part, to Jon Tester suggesting as much during an interview on MSNBC). Back in April, I made my case for Schweitzer:
http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/4/9/205518/2445
Glad to see more people jumping on the Schweitzer bandwagon!
Posted by: The Caped Composer | Jun 6, 2008 12:46:52 PM
I was really disappointed yesterday to see that the leaked Obama VP short list did not have Schweitzer's name on it.
Hopefully that just means that he's not been discussed yet or that they're keeping some of the possible VP names private.
Posted by: Alex Stone-Tharp | Jun 11, 2008 10:13:31 AM
Alex, I somehow suspect that that list was full of red herrings. Do you seriously think the Obama team is considering John Kerry for the VP slot? They leaked that list so as to mislead both the media and McCain, and perhaps trick the latter into picking a very establishment candidate for VP, so that Obama will garner more positive attention when he makes an outside-the-box choice.
Plus, we now know that at least one of the names on that list-- Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland-- has taken himself out of the running.
Posted by: The Caped Composer | Jun 11, 2008 2:46:56 PM
I, too, subscribe to the red herring theory of leaked lists. Plus one of the vetters just resigned. Energy prices may be topic number one this summer. Governor Schweitzer has definite views on energy. In January someone will have to break the logjam on energy.
Posted by: Leo Brown | Jun 12, 2008 8:58:40 AM
As much as I support Brian Schweitzer in his political endeavors, I just don't see him as a second in command under anyone. There's an obvious independent streak in him that comes through bright and clear and no VP gets that allowance. He's running for re-election as governor and it's more important to have another four years of him helming Montana.
Posted by: Kevin McCarthy | Jun 28, 2008 10:35:06 AM
Ads by Google
(and yes, we know that sometimes they're very, very wrong. Other times, they're right on.)

