Jon Tester is Western Democratic
Montana, Senators, The Big Strategy

Congrats to Montana, Tester rolls over Morrison and has Burns in his path.

There is a lot to be said about how Conrad Burns will have a hard time against Jon Tester in the coming months, given the ditch he's driven himself into. But, Tester would have given him a fight even without Burns' self inflicted wounds.

Tester is what this website is all about, he is the Western Democrat:

In the mountains and ranchlands of the West, there are Democrats who understand real America. Out here, far from the nation's capital, there are Democrats who understand skepticism of the federal government. Out here, Americans will find Democrats comfortable in jeans and boots. In the West, we can find Democrats able to speak plainly in the language of real America.

As Matt Singer reflects last night:

But the idea that Tester only gets the support of die-hard lefties is a complete misnomer. At the Billings event yesterday, Tester had a noticeably large tent. He had Republicans crossing over to support him (both my Republican grandmother and my lean-Republican father are doing something rare for them: voting the D ballot this year). He had Dems of the more business-minded and conservative variety, like Senator Brent Cromley, there showing their support. And then he had a number of more liberal folks like myself down there.

The fact is that the difference between Tester and Morrison isn’t just ideological, although ideology is part of it. There’s also a huge cultural difference. Chuck Johnson recently portrayed this as stylistic — it’s not. It’s a part of these two men’s backgrounds, upbringing, and how they’ve lived their lives.

Jon Tester was raised a third-generation family farmer. His father and grandfather taught him how to work the land for a living. He went to school, became a music teacher briefly and then ran the farm and went organic after making some business decisions and seeing how chemicals affected his own family’s health. After serving on the local school board and soil conservation district, he was recruited to run for Montana Senate in one of the most conservative districts won by a Democrat in Montana. He stood by his values and won, then won reelection by a wide margin. And he still doesn’t shy away from speaking his mind. Interestingly, David Crisp, in a comments thread, expressed concern that Tester failed to provide a good enough political answer to explain his stance on the same-sex marriage question. My feeling? Tester’s honest. And what we need right now is honesty — a man who would rather have his integrity than a seat in the Senate and a man who will us that if we don’t think we can trust him, we might as well send him back to his farm, where he can continue the life he loves.

Emmett O'Connell | June 7, 2006 | Comment on This Post (18 so far)
Permalink: Jon Tester is Western Democratic
Montana, Senators, The Big Strategy

E-mail to a Friend

Your Name:

Your Personal Note:

Your Email:

Friends' Emails*:

* Separate addresses with commas,
semicolons, tabs, or line breaks.

Comments

I read that piece and it reminded me of my new favorite son of Virginia, James Webb. If you changed some of the localities mentioned, I would think you were talking about the same guy. Integrity above all else!!!

Watch Virginia next week. I think we will see two great Senators going into Washington next year, Tester and Webb.

Posted by: thegools | Jun 7, 2006 12:16:54 PM

Ideology had nothing to do with this race. This wasn't liberal Democrat vs. conservative Democrat, or some great uprising from "netroots" or the "liberal blogosphere." That's all bullshit. Montana Democrats voted on ethics, pure and simple. There's no more to read into this: that's it, done, finito. Morrison was banging his secretary; Tester doesn't have a secretary to bang. We have a winner!

Ideology WILL come into play against Conrad Burns though, and then all of the liberal activists in CA and NY, who (quite strangely) think they made some huge difference in a primary race in Montana, could get a rude awakening.

Posted by: WyoBlueDog | Jun 7, 2006 2:18:20 PM

I really do think this race was about people power vs the establishment. The Dscc obviously wanted the Baucus type Morrison to win. The people wanted Schweitzer type Tester to win. And Tester won in a landslide. And since the numbers show Tester already beating Burns I think he is a strong person to take him on.

Posted by: ketu | Jun 7, 2006 2:34:25 PM

The gun-loving rancher, Brian Schweitzer, is more conservative than many think. And I think comparing someone to Max Baucus is not a negative. He's found a way to win consistently in Montana, as a Democrat for a couple decades now. How is that "establishment?" A Montana Democrat is suddenly considered "establishment" now...

Posted by: WyoBlueDog | Jun 7, 2006 2:40:15 PM

BTW, Jon Tester is nerely broke now...

Posted by: WyoBlueDog | Jun 7, 2006 2:46:54 PM

I don't know what you are talking about.
when i said Baucus I meant more conservative. When I said Schweitzer I meant more populist. The DC establishment was going for Morrison. If you look at the type of emails Morrison and tester sent out Morrison was all about Money. Tester's was all about people. Tester is different and that is why this race is so exciting

Posted by: ketu | Jun 7, 2006 4:04:01 PM

Schweitzer is just as conservative as Max Baucus, but because he's a governor and not a senator, the focus is less on abortion, gay marriage (which Schweitzer is against), and other suchlike issues, and more on Montana issues.

And you don't get it: Morrison wanted money, because you need money to WIN. As I said earlier, Tester's campaign didn't focus on money and is now BROKE!

Posted by: WyoBlueDog | Jun 7, 2006 4:07:34 PM

Well Morrison lost, so much for his money. And I haven't heard from anyone anywhere that tester is flat out broke. I know he had less money than Morrison and Morrison drmatically outspent him but I haven't seen any indication that he is broke. Even if that happened the Dscc will bring in huge funds anyway.

Posted by: ketu | Jun 7, 2006 4:58:15 PM

Hello,

Most of the elections across the country have been primairies, so I'm just glad that Democrats are showing strong.

Now is the time for the party, liberal or conservative, to pull together and make sure that we win back both houses of congress.

I dont think there should be any argument about who is establishment and who isnt. Politicians are Politicians, plain and simple. Doesnt matter if they grew up on a farm, ranch, or if their family has been here since the Mayflower. Populism has existed and will continue to exist, but the bottom line, is that to survive in Washington DC, you have to become part of the establishment. Surviving and winning elections at home is one thing, but winning and actually making a difference in Washington is another. Id rather have a winner in Washington than a benchwarmer.

Daniel Cardenas

Posted by: Daniel C. Cardenas Jr. | Jun 7, 2006 5:08:36 PM

agreed

Posted by: ketu | Jun 7, 2006 5:15:13 PM

I'd agree as well, Daniel. BTW, where in WY are you located?

Here's a link to Sabato's Crystal Ball, one of the premiere sites for politics. Tester is broke.

http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/2006/senate/?state=MT

Geez, I don't want him to be, and in fact want him to win in November. But we have to deal with the reality (same as if Morrison won).

And the realities are:

- Tester is well to the left of center.
- He has very little money left to challenge Burns.
- Burns has a LOT of baggage and can be beaten.
- Burns has money though which will help him considerably.

Posted by: WyoBlueDog | Jun 7, 2006 6:40:55 PM

Hello,

Im near Riverton.

I havent really kept up on the Montana race even though its so close. Im really more concerned about the Arizona and Nevada races.

I think that the money will start to flow this week for Tester and others who won their races or their showings were any where close to beating a republican in November.

Daniel Cardenas

Posted by: Daniel C. Cardenas Jr. | Jun 7, 2006 7:13:51 PM

If Tester is broke, then every dollar he's spent so far has been a great investment that will come back many-fold. He now comes roaring out of the primary with national attention from a 25-point win, and I'm sure the dollars are already flowing in.

Posted by: OR Dem | Jun 7, 2006 7:16:52 PM

I'll repeat what I wrote last night, since there are some of the opinion that Tester is broke.

Click here to go to my Act Blue page and donate to Jon Tester so we can give Conrad Burns an appropriate retirement. Add $.01 to your donation so Tester knows it's coming from his friends in Washington State. And if you prefer go to Jon Tester's site and donate to him there. It doesn't matter how much you donate, just that you give Jon Tester what you can afford so we can take back America.

Posted by: Ken Camp | Jun 7, 2006 8:32:38 PM

I haven't looked at this thread in a while. I will say, though, that with WyoBlueDog's discussion of Schweitzer and Baucus, he's pretty clearly revealed a complete lack of understanding of Montana politics.

As for Tester's financial situation, it's going to be fine.

Posted by: Matt Singer | Jun 23, 2006 12:31:35 PM

Yes, it is I who has no knowledge of Montana politics. And where are you from, Singer?

You're right Tester won because of all of the liberal internet activists in San Fran, Berkeley, New York, and because of extremists like Kos Moulitsas Zunigas. That's why Jon Tester won. The fact that an ethically pure candidate had to go up against Conrad Burns had nothing to do with it, and the fact that John Morrison was fucking his secretary had nought to do with it either.

It was you liberal internet activists from the coast.

Living in Loopy Liberal Land must be great! But I like reality here in the USA.

For more agitation, and less bullshit, go to:
http://agitated-grizzly.blogspot.com/

Posted by: WyoBlueDog | Jun 25, 2006 2:26:31 PM

CSpan showed the 1st Montana Senate debate. If Jon Tester gets elected, he'll be a great Ben Nelson/Mark Pryor/Jim Matheson style conservative Democrat! For a balanced budget amendment, against giving amnesty to illegal lawbreakers, and he loves his guns!

Posted by: WyoBlueDog | Jun 25, 2006 8:03:19 PM

Integrity. Hmmm. I thought Tester was an absolute rarity in politics thse days. Smart, honest, git 'er done. Then I read more about his position on gay marriage. While he would not vote for a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, he does not support it. This is staggering. If someone asked him if interracial marriage were supportable, and he said no, all of us progressives would be up in arms. But gays, even with Tester, are an okay group to exclude from the rights given to all others. That's cowardly at worst, ignorant at best. I am not voting for this man, just as I would have withheld my vote if he were a racist.

Posted by: Lynn | Oct 14, 2006 10:48:49 AM

Ads by Google

(and yes, we know that sometimes they're very, very wrong. Other times, they're right on.)

Post a comment