Bill Richardson: A Western Primary?
There's a great article by the Miami Herald's Andres Oppenheimer over at HispanicBusiness.com. In the piece, he shares the news that New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson is working to develop a Western primary (as suggested by Emmett here).
Richardson is leading an effort by four Western states -- New Mexico, Colorado, Utah and Arizona -- to hold a regional primary in the first week in February 2008, shortly after the Iowa and New Hampshire contests. Most of these states have large Hispanic populations and can be won by either party.
Beyond that, Oppenheimer - who usually writes about Latin America - points out that Richardson would help drive the Democrats to the West; and would help the Party regain its footing among Latinos.
Oppenheimer called Richardson and asked him the magic question:
When I called Richardson earlier this week and asked him whether he would run, he told me, "My main concentration is the New Mexico Legislature in January, and my re-election as governor in 2006. Beyond that, who knows?"
My translation: He's running like crazy.
Kari Chisholm | November 23, 2004 | Comment on This Post (4 so far) |
Your Name: Your Personal Note: | Your Email: Friends' Emails*: |
Comments
A four corners primary... not a bad idea, and it ditches the potential problem of a California dominated Super . Should the Northwest follow suit and do a regional OR-WA-ID-MT primary? The west is not monolithic, so splitting into regions may make the local issues stand out more. I doubt if Arizonans give a whit about dam removal in the northwest, but they may have something to say about Yucca Mountain. Regional primaries would force the candidates to take stances on some very divisive (i.e. important) issues of the day.
Posted by: Tim Mooney | Nov 24, 2004 7:26:37 AM
Sure, Big Bill is in the running.
Hillary may fight hard enough to get the VP slot.
Posted by: ROGNM | Nov 27, 2004 3:27:48 PM
Here's a copy of the Democrats for the West statement on a regional primary. The statement will be delivered tomorrow to the DNC's Commission on Presidential Nomination Timing and Scheduling.
May 6, 2005
Democrats for the West Calls for Western Primary
Mr. Chairman, members of the Commission, thank you for the opportunity to testify here today. My name is Brian Kuehl and I am here representing Democrats for the West, the nation’s first regional party organization.
Democrats for the West was founded last year by a coalition of state parties from nine western states – Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, Wyoming, New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado and Alaska.
Democrats for the West is a new organization composed of Democratic stalwarts such as Stewart Udall, Cecil Andrus and Mike Sullivan, along with state party officials, rising stars, and local activists working to bring together Democrats from across the region to build long-term governing majorities throughout the West – one of the nation’s fastest-growing regions. Democrats for the West unites Democrats across state lines, adds value to state party efforts, and shares ideas and resources.
We are here today to strongly endorse the concept of an early western regional primary. For our purposes, I will use the term “regional primary” to mean a coordinated set of state primaries and/or caucuses held across the western states over a period of a few days or perhaps a week.
Why do Democrats for the West support a western primary? Why do we ask the Democratic National Committee to support it?
We are engaged in a long-term, region-wide party-building effort. We see a regional primary as an important component of that effort, and we are actively working toward that goal in each of the western states. As a compliment to our on-the-ground efforts, we believe the time is exactly right for the DNC to endorse a call for an early western primary.
We are not arguing that the West should be at the very front of the primary calendar or even that we should remain permanently near the front of the primary season. We are open to a fair rotation system. But from both a Democratic and a national perspective, we believe that 2008 is the right year to convene an early western regional primary.
We clearly have a partisan realignment occurring in the Rockies, and the swing is in a strongly Democratic direction. In the 8 states proposed for this primary (Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming) there were no Democratic governors by 2000. Now half of the states have Democratic governors – Governors Richardson, Napolitano, Freudenthal and Schweitzer. We picked up a U.S. Senate seat and a House seat in 2004, and we turned both Colorado and Montana’s legislatures from red to blue. Across the region, we out-gained Republicans in legislative bodies. And we’re electing Democratic mayors around the region – from Denver to Salt Lake City to Boise.
This is a strong, well-earned swing in a Democratic direction across the region. As Democrats for the West, we want to consolidate our gains and push this swing to the top of the ballot to produce a substantial number of Democratic electoral votes in 2008.
This much is absolutely clear: no region in the country is better positioned to produce new blue states than the West. We believe that with coordinated regional party building efforts and concerted attention from Democratic Presidential candidates, many western states will endorse the Democratic Presidential nominee in 2008.
That having been said, no matter how powerful the Democratic arguments for a western primary might be, no major rescheduling of primary dates can occur without broad bipartisan support. And here again, the time is right to give the West a stronger voice in the primary process. The idea of a western primary or caucus has strong bipartisan support. That support was evident when the Western Governors Association endorsed the idea in 2004. Not only governors, but also other leaders from both parties in several western states have expressed their support. The reason is simply that both parties in the western states are tired of being passed by during presidential primaries.
Both parties in the West recognize that a simultaneous regional primary or caucus will prompt Presidential candidates to focus on issues critical to the western region. Even beyond issues, a western primary will make westerners in general feel like they count for something at the national level. That’s good for the West.
And if the DNC supports this move, it will be a welcome signal to westerners that the Democratic Party really cares about the West. And to many westerners, that’s not always been clear.
We proudly call ourselves Democrats for the West, and we will continue our regional party building efforts with or without an early western primary.
But fundamentally, we want our western neighbors to know that our entire Party is “for the West.” Supporting this initiative is one way that the national Democratic Party can send the message that we are all “Democrats for the West.”
Posted by: Brian Kuehl | May 13, 2005 2:25:22 PM
I support the idea of a western primary. I have felt my entire voting life that we in the west have no choice on who runs for President. It is time to open the choice to more than just a few eastern states and Iowa.
I am active in local Deomcrats and have brought this subject up several tiems to no avail. Please send me information and contacts and I will work endlessly to support the grassroots initiative.
Posted by: Carla Barnes | May 16, 2005 8:48:57 PM
Ads by Google
(and yes, we know that sometimes they're very, very wrong. Other times, they're right on.)
